The United States Constitution Requires
that our President be a natural born
citizen of the United States
Donate to support this quest for the truth
|
|
|---|---|
|
Need For Donations Time again to ask for donations to support our efforts to prove that Barry Soetoro a/k/a Barack H. Obama is constitutionally ineligible to be President of the United States. We are now in our eleventh [11th] month of pursuing the truth. We have three [3] cases pending in the Federal Courts [status of cases are set forth below in latest Press Release of 6/09/09]. We must make the citizens of our country aware of this “HOAX.” We must raise the awareness from 15 million to 75 million – ASAP. If each of you can send $25.00 and have three [3] friends, family or associates send $25.00 each for a total of $100.00 at this time it would help in our efforts. WND sign campaign is terrific, but not going far enough. We cannot assume people will ask if the signs only read: Where is your Birth Certificate? We want to put up signs and sell bumper stickers saying: “OBAMA – Where is YOUR Birth Certificate ?” Signs are expensive – thousands of dollars for one [1] sign. Please help! Thank you.
|
Philip J. Berg, Esquire |
|---|
A video where during the salute to the flag, Barack H. Obama Jr. has his hands in a downward position.
|
Welcome to Obama Crimes |
|
Press Release For Immediate Release: - 07/02/2009
U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder; his Staff; and the United States Department of Justice to which he Over-SeesViolated the Code of Federal Regulations as well as Federal Criminal Laws Pertaining to their Conflict-of-Interestin Berg’s Qui Tam Case [False Claims Act] against Barry Soetoro a/k/a Barack H. Obama and Berg has filed a Motion for Reconsideration
(Washington, DC – 07/02/2009) - Philip J. Berg, Esquire, the first Attorney who filed suit against Barack H. Obama challenging Senator Obama's lack of Constitutional "qualifications/eligibility" to serve as President of the United States and his cases that are still pending in Federal Court, Berg vs. Obama [Third Circuit Court of Appeals No. 08 – 4340]; this case - Berg as Relator v. Obama; [U. S. District Court for the District of Columbia No. 08-cv-01933]; and Hollister vs. Soetoro a/k/a Obama, et al [U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia, No. 09-5080]; announced today that he filed a Motion for Reconsideration in the Qui Tam [False Claims Act] Case filed in the U.S. District Court, District of Columbia as United States Attorney General Eric Holder and his Office have a Conflict-of-Interest and inasmuch violated both the Federal Regulations as well as Federal Criminal Codes. U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder, his Office, his Staff and the United States Department of Justice are required to uphold and ensure our laws; the laws of the United States are upheld and enforced. Article II, Section 3 of the U.S. Constitution states: “The Constitution entrusts the Executive with duty to take Care that the Laws be faithfully executed." Berg said, “The request of the Government to Dismiss his Qui Tam action against Barry Soetoro a/k/a Barack H. Obama is in clear violation of the U.S. Attorney General’s duties pursuant to Article II, Section 3 and should ‘NOT’ be allowed”. Berg continues, “I furnished the Government and the Court with the information as to Barry Soetoro a/k/a Barack Hussein Obama’s legal name, which is Barry Soetoro and his citizenship status as Indonesian; I furnished sworn Affidavits showing Barry Soetoro a/k/a Barack Hussein Obama was born in Mombosa, Kenya; I presented evidence that the Certification of Live Birth [COLB] presented on the internet by Barry Soetoro a/k/a Barack Hussein Obama has been deemed a forged and altered document; I presented evidence that the birth announcement filed in the Hawaiian newspapers regarding Barack H. Obama on or about August 13, 1961 could not be verified; I presented evidence Barry Soetoro a/k/a Barack Hussein Obama never resided in the address on the birth announcement; and I raised the genuine issues pertaining to Barry Soetoro a/k/a Barack Hussein Obama’s college records wherein Berg is informed, believes and therefore alleges Barry Soetoro a/k/a Barack Hussein Obama attended Occidental College in California and Columbia University in New York and Harvard Law School as a foreign student. None of which have been refuted by the Government”.“Instead of investigating the true issues, the Government through the United States Attorney General Eric Holder, his staff and the United States Department of Justice, who U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder also over-sees moved to Dismiss the Qui Tam action instead of upholding our United States Constitution and the very laws stated to protect “we the people” from any individual usurping the Office of the President of the United States”. Berg’s Qui Tam was regarding the U.S. Senator Position from Illinois held by Barry Soetoro a/k/a Barack H. Obama and the salary and benefits Obama drew based on fraudulent claims. This is a very unique situation as Barry Soetoro a/k/a Barack Hussein Obama is now our acting President of the United States. President Obama appointed Eric Holder for the position of the United States Attorney General and Mr. Holder reports directly to President Obama. This creates a huge Conflict-of-Interest with anyone from U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder’s Office having any association with the Qui Tam matter against, now, President Obama. There are Federal Statutory prohibitions and related regulations addressing Conflicts-of-Interest on the part of present officers or employees of the Federal (and in some instances of the District of Columbia) government.The Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), 5 CFR § 2635, et seq. and 5 CFR § 2640, et seq. governs Governmental Employees, including U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder and his staff. 5 CFR § 2635.101 states in pertinent part, “(a) Public service is a public trust. Each employee has a responsibility to the United States Government and its citizens to place loyalty to the Constitution, laws and ethical principles above private gain. In addition to the standards of ethical conduct set forth in the Code of Federal Regulations, there are Conflict-of-Interest statutes that prohibit certain conduct. Criminal Conflict-of-Interest statutes of general applicability to all employees, 18 U.S.C. §§ 201, 203, 205, 208, and 209, are summarized in the appropriate subparts located in these chapters and must be taken into consideration in determining whether conduct is proper. As to the restrictions on Conflicts-of-Interest during government service, only Section 208 is illuminated by formal regulations, which are found in the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR). 5 CFR. § 2640.103 “Prohibition” states: “(a) Statutory prohibition. Unless permitted by 18 U.S.C. 208(b) (1)–(4), an employee is prohibited by 18 U.S.C. 208(a) from participating personally and substantially in an official capacity in any particular matter in which, to his knowledge, he or any other person specified in the statute has a financial interest, if the particular matter will have a direct and predictable effect on that interest. The restrictions of 18 U.S.C. 208 are described more fully in 5 CFR 2635.401 and 2635.402. Berg stated, “U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder has a financial interest as does his staff as they draw their income from the Government who is over-seen by Barry Soetoro a/k/a Barack H. Obama”. “Eric Holder joined President Obama’s presidential campaign as senior legal advisor and also served as one of three [3] members on Obama’s vice-presidential selection committee. In December 2008, then President-elect, Obama asked Eric Holder to serve in his cabinet as the U.S. Attorney General. Mr. Holder was appointed by President Obama and now serves as the United States Attorney General; is the head of the United States Department of Justice and United States Attorney General’s Office. Eric Holder is paid by the United States Government and reports directly to President Obama. Eric Holder has a direct financial interest in that he draws a salary based on his position as United States Attorney General. This Conflict-of-Interest goes beyond financial. The United States Attorney General is the Chief Law enforcement officer of the Federal Government and represents the United States in legal matters and gives advice and opinions to the President of the United States”. Conflicts-of-Interest include but are not limited to a financial interest; a personal interest; improper business practices; etc. Berg continued, “It is clear U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder and the staff in which he supervises have a huge Conflict-of-Interest as they have financial interests as well as personal interests which limits them from doing their job as required pursuant to the United States Constitution and therefore, Attorney General Eric Holder should recuse himself and/or designate Relator Philip J. Berg to proceed. Berg concluded, "I am not giving up and am continuing my legal fight to prove Obama is not constitutionally qualified/eligible to be President of the United States. I am proceeding for the 305 + million people in 'our' U.S.A., for 'our' forefathers and for the 1.5 million men and women that have died defending our Constitution in the many wars over the years and the 1.5 million men and women who were injured in those wars,"
For Immediate Release: - 06/11/2009 U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder Refuses to Prosecute President Obama Under False Claims Act whereby Obama was accused of Defrauding the U.S. Treasury by Illegally being a U.S. Senator from Illinois as Obama is an Illegal Alien, not a U.S. Citizen Berg brought action against Obama and after months of delay Holder’s Staff refused to investigate Berg raised issue of “Conflict of Interest” and why Discovery was “not” turned over and Judge Roberts Dismissed case against Obama on June 9th obamacrimes.com is the web site for the truth about Obama (Washington, DC – 06/11/2009) - Philip J. Berg, Esquire, the first Attorney who filed suit against Barack H. Obama challenging Senator Obama's lack of Constitutional "qualifications/eligibility" to serve as President of the United States and his cases that are still pending, Berg vs. Obama [2 cases – 1 under seal] and Hollister vs. Soetoro a/k/a Obama, et al announced today that United States Attorney General Eric Holder refused to prosecute President Barack H. Obama for Obama illegally running for and holding the U.S. Senate seat from Illinois because he was Constitutionally ineligible to be a U.S. Senator. A False Claims Act [FCA] case is when a person has knowledge that another party has obtained money from the Government based on a false claim. In this instance, in order to be a United States Senator, you must be a United States Citizen for nine [9] years. Obama is not a United States Citizen and therefore, usurped the Office of U.S. Senator for Illinois and obtained payment from the U.S. Department of the Treasury based on his false statements that he was a U.S. Citizen and constitutionally eligible to serve the position of United States Senator. Berg said, “What a miscarriage of justice! At a closed door hearing on June 9, 2009 because of the status of the “sealed case,” sealed because of the nature of the case, that being a “Qui Tam” or FCA [False Claims Action] case, the Attorney General through his representatives refused to proceed with the prosecution of Obama for fraudulently serving as a U.S. Senator from Illinois for 3 ½ years. [FCA cases are usually used in Medicare/Medicaid fraud cases]” Berg continued, “I presented overwhelming evidence that Obama was ineligible to be a U.S. Senator and therefore, Obama fraudulently received a salary and benefits of nearly $1 Million Dollars. Since the case was ‘Dismissed with Prejudice’ it is now ‘Unsealed’ and the record is open for review. The case, Berg vs. Obama, U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, No. 08-cv-1933 and is available on Pacer or our website, obamacrimes.com. I, Phil Berg, will be Appealing this case !” Berg said, “During oral argument, I raised the issue of a ‘Conflict of Interest’ as Attorney General Holder’s boss is the President Barack H. Obama, so how could they properly review this case? I suggested the appointment of a Special Prosecutor. I also raised the issue that any Discovery used in the Government’s decision to have the case dismissed, which was secured by the U.S. Department of Justice and U.S. Attorney General’s Office should be turned over to me as the Relator, however, no Discovery was turned over.” Article II, Section 3 of the U.S. Constitution entrusts the Executive, which includes the United States Attorney General, with duty to take Care that the Laws be faithfully executed. Berg stated, “I am very disappointed that U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder through his Staff has failed to uphold his duties.” Berg concluded, "I am not giving up and am continuing my legal fight to prove Obama is not constitutionally qualified/eligible to be President of the United States. I am proceeding for the 305 + million people in 'our' U.S.A., for 'our' forefathers and for the 1.5 million men and women that have died defending our Constitution in the many wars over the years and the 1.5 million men and women who were injured in those wars," * * * * * * * The following is an update on my three [3] pending cases regarding my challenge to Obama's lack of qualifications/eligibility to be President. As you know, I was the first to legally raise the issue - having filed my lawsuit on August 21, 2008, before the DNC Convention. Status of Cases: Berg vs. Obama, Third Circuit Court of Appeals No. 08 – 4340 Briefs have been filed by all parties. This is case that was dismissed in U.S. District Court, Eastern District of PA Judge Surrick dismissed for lack of "standing" by Philip J. Berg This is case that I bypassed Third Circuit to U.S. Supreme Court - where U.S. Supreme Court denied several Injunctions and to hear case. However, case is still alive in the Third Circuit. Oral argument is tentatively scheduled for September/October 2009. Berg vs. Obama, U.S. District Court, Case No. 08-cv-1933 Case originally filed under seal on 11/07/08. The Government moved for the dismissal of the case that was granted on June 10, 2009 at which time Judge Roberts ordered the case unsealed. Case will be appealed. Hollister vs. Soetoro a/k/a Obama, U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia, No. 09-5080 U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, No. 08-cv-02254 This is the case of retired Air Force Colonel Hollister who is on lifetime Presidential recall. Hollister needs to know if recalled by Soetoro/Obama - must he obey an Order by legal President or disobey the illegal Order by a Constitutionally ineligible/unqualified "Usurper" President. Case was dismissed and Sanction of “Reprimand” imposed on our local attorney. Appeal has been filed to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia. We are waiting for the briefing schedule so we can file our opening briefs. For copies of all Press Releases and Court Pleadings, go to: obamacrimes.com
For Further Information Contact: Philip J. Berg, Esquire 555 Andorra Glen Court, Suite 12 Lafayette Hill, PA 19444-2531 Cell (610) 662-3005 (610) 825-3134 (800) 993-PHIL [7445] Fax (610) 834-7659 philjberg@obamacrimes.com
Press Release
For Immediate Release: - 06/09/2009
Berg states Orly Taitz has gone too far; Berg sues Taitz for violating individuals basic rights – Privacy by revealing birth dates and Social Security numbersBerg states Taitz should be disbarred – her actions have been detrimental to the positive efforts of so many to out Obama as he is Constitutionally ineligible to be President as he is not natural bornBerg Filed DEFAULT against Taitz and on 6/08/09 filed OPPOSITION to Taitz’s Motion to Set Aside Default Judgmentalso sued is Sankey Investigations for the same reasons and others for defamation and libelobamacrimes.com is the web site for the truth about Obama
View Documents Plaintiff's Opposition To set Aside Default
(Lafayette Hill, PA – 06/09/2009) - Philip J. Berg, Esquire, the first Attorney who filed suit against Barack H. Obama challenging Senator Obama's lack of Constitutional "qualifications/eligibility" to serve as President of the United States and his cases that are still pending, Berg vs. Obama [2 cases – 1 under seal] and Hollister vs. Soetoro a/k/a Obama, et al announced today that he had filed a lawsuit against Orly Taitz for her unprofessional and unlawful tactics by disseminating birth dates and Social Security Numbers and other vicious lies to harm innocent people.
Berg said, “Orly Taitz, Esquire must be disbarred ! Orly has been grabbing the headlines, but doing disservice to the millions who want Obama to prove he is constitutionally eligible/qualified to be President of the United States.
Presently Orly has only one [1] case pending and in my opinion, not very strong and definitely not on point. On the other hand, I [Berg] have three [3] lawsuits pending, all in Federal Court, two [2] in the Appellate Courts [Third Circuit – argument was scheduled end of May 2009, but now the earliest it will be heard is September or October of 2009 on the issue of ‘standing’; the other in the District of Columbia Court of Appeals (Hollister case)]. The 3rd case is ‘under seal.’”
Berg continued, “Orly has gone too far by e-mailing the Social Security number of my assistant, Lisa. By doing so, with the help of Neil Sankey, Sankey Investigating, Inc. and the Sankey Firm, Orly has violated State [California] and Federal laws and has admitted to the mass e-mailing distribution to tens of thousands of individuals. After suit was filed against Orly and other Defendants, Orly’s Answer was due May 26, 2009, however, it was not filed. I requested Default to be entered against Orly and other Defendants for their failure to Answer the Complaint. The Court entered the Default on May 27, 2009.”
Berg stated, “On or about May 28, 2009, Orly faxed a one [1] page Motion to Set Aside the Default entered on May 27, 2009 against her and Defend our Freedoms Foundation, Inc. I, Berg, filed our Response in Opposition to Orly’s Request to Set Aside the Default on June 8th and can be found on my website at obamacrimes.com.
Neil Sankey appeared on Plains Radio Network on May 28, 2009 with a made up story that Lisa Ostella sent him emails and asked him to investigate my assistant, Lisa and me. This was a completely fabricated story. Neil Sankey and Orly conspired and not only altered emails sent from Lisa Ostella, they created emails using Lisa Ostella’s email address, which Lisa Ostella did not have any knowledge of, never gave any permission for anyone to use her email address, never gave authorization to draft emails on her behalf, she never drafted the emails nor did she send them. In so doing, Neil Sankey and Orly altered and forged documents (emails) of Lisa Ostella. On May 31, 2009, Orly posted the altered and forged emails on her website with a statement that Lisa Ostella sent them to Neil Sankey, knowing the information to be completely false.”
Berg continued, “We are fighting to uphold our Constitution and the laws of our Nation. Neil Sankey and Orly are not helping our cause by degrading those working so hard to learn the truth and breaking the very laws we are desperately trying to uphold.”
Berg said, “Our focus should be on whether our President, Barry Soetoro a/k/a Barack H. Obama is constitutionally eligible/qualified to serve as the United States President, as it appears he is not a “natural born” United States citizen and eligible pursuant to the United States Constitution.”
Berg requested, “All those that want to prove that Obama is constitutionally qualified, please send letters and emails to the White House requesting that the President of the United States show his credentials proving he is in fact a ‘natural born’ United States citizen and eligible to serve as our President.”
Berg continued, “The Obama candidacy is the biggest ‘HOAX’ perpetrated on the citizens of the United States in 230 years, since our nation was established. Obama must be legally removed from office. I believe that 15 to 20 million people are aware of the Obama 'HOAX,' and we must make 75 to 100 million people aware. When people are made aware of the Obama 'HOAX,' that Obama has not proven he is constitutionally 'qualified/eligible' to be President; that Obama has not produced his original (vault version) 'Birth Certificate;' that Obama has not produced legal documents to show he legally changed his name from his 'adopted' name of 'Barry Soetoro' from Indonesia; they will demand Obama be removed from the Office of President of the United States."
Berg concluded, "I am proceeding for the 305 + million people in 'our' U.S.A., for 'our' forefathers and for the 1.5 million men and women that have died defending our Constitution in the many wars over the years and the 1.5 million men and women who were injured in those wars, with our legal fight to prove that Obama is not constitutionally qualified/eligible to be President."
* * * * * * *
The following is an update on my three [3] pending cases regarding my challenge to Obama's lack of qualifications/eligibility to be President.
Also, I am preparing to file a 4th case - Quo Warranto [challenge person in office - that does not meet the qualifications].
As you know, I was the first to legally raise the issue - having filed my lawsuit on August 21, 2008, before the DNC Convention.
Status of Cases:
Berg vs. Obama, Third Circuit Court of Appeals No. 08 – 4340 Briefs have been filed by all parties. This is case that was dismissed in U.S. District Court, Eastern District of PA Judge Surrick dismissed for lack of "standing" by Philip J. Berg This is case that I bypassed Third Circuit to U.S. Supreme Court - where U.S. Supreme Court denied several Injunctions and to hear case. However, case is still alive in the Third Circuit. Oral argument is tentatively scheduled for September/October 2009.
Berg vs. Obama, U.S. District Court Case filed under seal on 11/07/08 – cannot be discussed.
Hollister vs. Soetoro a/k/a Obama, U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia, No. 09-5080U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, No. 08-cv-02254This is the case of retired Air Force Colonel Hollister who is on lifetime Presidential recall.Hollister needs to know if recalled by Soetoro/Obama - must he obey an Order by legal President or disobey the illegal Order by a Constitutionally ineligible/unqualified "Usurper" President.Case was dismissed and Sanction of “Reprimand” imposed on our local attorney.Appeal has been filed to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia. We are waiting for the briefing schedule so we can file our opening briefs.
For Further Information Contact:
Philip J. Berg, Esquire555 Andorra Glen Court, Suite 12 Lafayette Hill, PA 19444-2531
Cell (610) 662-3005(610) 825-3134(800) 993-PHIL [7445]Fax (610) 834-7659
Press Release For Immediate Release: - 05/27/2009 Third Circuit Court of Appeals Delays Oral Argument on Berg’s Appeal regarding “No Standing” Issue
But Berg is determined to continue his fight to show that Obama is Constitutionally ineligible to be President because Obama is “not” natural born as required by our U.S. Constitution obamacrimes.com is the web site for the truth about Obama
(Lafayette Hill, PA – 05/27/2009) - Philip J. Berg, Esquire, the first Attorney who filed suit against Barack H. Obama challenging Senator Obama's lack of Constitutional "qualifications/eligibility" to serve as President of the United States and his cases that are still pending, Berg vs. Obama [2 cases – 1 under seal] and Hollister vs. Soetoro a/k/a Obama, et al announced today that he is totally disappointed that the Third Circuit Court of Appeals has delayed “Oral Argument” in the case of Berg vs. Obama, No. 08 – 4340, the case where Judge Surrick denied Berg’s case on the basis that Berg did not have “standing.” Berg stated, “About two [2] months ago I received notice that the Third Circuit would schedule ‘Oral Argument’ the last week of May 2009 or the first week of June 2009. Not hearing for a specific date, Berg’s office contacted the Third Circuit and was just advised that “Oral Argument” is not scheduled as previously advised and the earliest time for ‘Oral Argument’ is in September or October of 2009, and notification will be sent. I am totally disappointed that there has been this delay.” Berg continued, “I am determined to keep fighting lawfully through our Court system; I believe there is a Judge or Justices that will grant us Discovery as it is essential for the following that the truth be told: o the 305+ million citizens of the United States; o our ‘Forefathers;’ and o the 3 + million that have been injured or died defending our U.S. Constitution over the past 230 + years. We must expose Obama, as this is the greatest ‘HOAX’ perpetrated on the citizens of the United States in 230 years, since our nation was established. Obama must be legally removed from office. I believe that 10 to 15 million people are aware of the Obama 'HOAX,' and we must make 75 million people aware. When people are made aware of the Obama 'HOAX,' that Obama has not proven he is constitutionally 'qualified/eligible' to be President; that Obama has not produced his original (vault version) 'Birth Certificate;' that Obama has not produced legal documents to show he legally changed his name from his 'adopted' name of 'Barry Soetoro' from Indonesia; they will demand Obama be removed from his Office of President of the United States." The following is an update on my three [3] pending cases regarding my challenge to Obama's lack of qualifications/eligibility to be President. As you know, Berg was the first to legally raise the issue - having filed a lawsuit on August 21, 2008, before the DNC Convention. Status of Cases: Berg vs. Obama, Third Circuit Court of Appeals No. 08 – 4340 Brief have been filed by all parties. This is case that was dismissed in U.S. District Court, Eastern District of PA Judge Surrick dismissed for lack of "standing" by Philip J. Berg This is case that I bypassed Third Circuit to U.S. Supreme Court - where U.S. Supreme Court denied several Injunctions and to hear case. However, case is still alive in Third Circuit. Oral argument was scheduled for the end of May 2009; now the earliest will be September or October 2009. Berg vs. Obama, U.S. District Court Case filed under seal on 11/07/08 – cannot be discussed. Hollister vs. Soetoro a/k/a Obama, U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia, No. 09-5080 U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, No. 08-cv-02254 This is the case of retired Air Force Colonel Hollister who is on lifetime Presidential recall. Hollister needs to know if recalled by Soetoro/Obama - must he obey an Order by legal President or disobey the illegal Order by a constitutionally ineligible/unqualified "Usurper" President. Case was dismissed and Sanction of “Reprimand” imposed on our local attorney. Appeal has been filed to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia.
Press Release
For
Immediate Release: - 05/23/2009 As We Honor our Brave Men & Women who have died and been wounded protecting our U.S. Constitution It is appalling how Barack Obama disgraces their memories by being Constitutionally ineligible to be President Total U.S. Military Deaths 1775 to 2008 = 1,593,124 Total U.S. Military Injuries 1775 to 1991 = 1,581,631
(Lafayette Hill, PA – 05/23/2009) - Philip J. Berg, Esquire, the first Attorney who filed suit against Barack H. Obama challenging Senator Obama's lack of Constitutional "qualifications/eligibility" to serve as President of the United States and his three [3] cases that are still pending, Berg vs. Obama [2 cases – 1 under seal] and Hollister vs. Soetoro a/k/a Obama, et al announced today that he and the obamacrimes.com supporters are Honoring those that died and were wounded defending our most sacred document, our U.S. Constitution. Berg said, “It is appalling how Barack Obama disgraces their memories by being Constitutionally ineligible to be President and not showing his Birth Certificate, Immigration Records, Adoption Papers and documents showing he legally changed his name from ‘Barry Soetoro to Barack Hussein Obama’ and other records to prove his eligibility. We are asking our supporters to send an e-mail to Barack Obama asking him to honor the fallen by showing that either he is or is not constitutionally eligible to be President, and if not, to resign from the Presidency now.
We are
asking all of our supporters to:
[1]
Stop what they are doing on Memorial Day, Monday, May 25, 2009
for a moment of silence at 3:00 p.m. in honor of the fallen who
have sacrificed their lives in defense of our U.S. Constitution
and the United States of America and those that were wounded;
[2]
Send this Press Release to everyone in their e-mail address book
and ask them to send on so that as many people we can reach will
pause to honor our fallen on Memorial Day;
[3]
Send an e-mail to Barack Obama by filling out his contact form
located at
http://www.whitehouse.gov/contact/
asking him to honor the fallen by showing that either he is or
is not constitutionally eligible to be President.
Deaths
and Injured of U.S. Military: 1775 - 3/25/2008 Per War: Revolutionary War 1775-1783: Total Enlisted (Serving): 290,000 Death Total 4,435
Non-Mortal
Wound Total: 6,188 War of 1812-1815: Total Enlisted (Serving): 286,730 Death Total 2,260 Non-Mortal Wound Total 4,505
Mexican War 1846-1848: Total Enlisted (Serving): 78,718 Death Total 13,283 Non-Mortal Wound Total 4,152
Civil War 1861-1865: Union Forces Only Total Enlisted (Serving): 2,213,363 Death Total 504,925
Non-Mortal
Wound Total 281,881 Spanish American War 1898-1902: Total Enlisted (Serving): 306,760 Death Total 2,831 Non-Mortal Wound Total 1,662
World War I 1917-1918: Total Enlisted (Serving): 4,734,991 Death Total 169,918 Non-Mortal Wound Total 204,002
World War II 1941-1946: Total Enlisted (Serving): 16,112,566 Death Total 696,596
Non-Mortal
Wound Total 671,846 Korean War 1950-1953: Total Enlisted (Serving): 5,720,000 Death Total 70,315
Non-Mortal
Wound Total 103,284 Vietnam Conflict 1964-1973: Total Enlisted (Serving): 8,744,000 Death Total 105,633 Non-Mortal Wound Total in-patient hospital 153,303 Non-Mortal; Wound Total out-patient hospital 150,341
Persian Gulf War 1990-1991: Total Enlisted (Serving): 2,225,000 Death Total 3,295 Non-Mortal Wound Total 467
Total U.S. Military Deaths: 1775 - 2008: 1,593,124 Total U.S. Military Injuries: 1775 - 1991: 1,581,631
1. The Alamo at San Antonio, Texas. A total of 2831 of our military dead.
2. The American Cemetery at Aisne-Marne, France. A total of 2289 of our military dead.
3. The American Cemetery at Ardennes, Belgium. A total of 5329 of our military dead.
4. The American Cemetery at Brittany, France. A total of 4410 of our military dead.
5. Brookwood , England American Cemetery. A total of 468 of our military dead.
6. Cambridge, England. A total of 3812 of our military dead.
7. Epinal, France American Cemetery. A total of 5525 of our military dead.
8. Flanders Field, Belgium. A total of 368 of our military dead.
9. Florence, Italy. A total of 4402 of our military dead.
10. Henri-Chapelle, Belgium. A total of 7992 of our military dead.
11. Lorraine, France. A total of 10,489 of our military dead.
12. Luxembourg, Luxembourg. A total of 5076 of our military dead.
13. Meuse-Argonne. A total of 14246 of our military dead.
14. Netherlands, Netherlands. A total of 8301 of our military dead.
15. Normandy, France. A total of 9387 of our military dead.
16. Oise-Aisne, France. A total of 6012 of our military dead.
17. Rhone, France. A total of 861 of our military dead.
18. Sicily, Italy. A total of 7861 of our military dead.
19. Somme, France. A total of 1844 of our military dead.
20. St. Mihiel, France. A total of 4153 of our military dead.
21. Suresnes, France. A total of 1541 of our military dead.
Press Release
For Immediate Release: - 05/17/2009
Press Release
Dear
Obamacrimes.com
supporter:
The more people that know about Obama "hiding" all of his records
regarding where he was born, the faster we will have Obama "legally"
removed from office. I believe 10 to 15 million people are aware of
Obama not being "natural born" and therefore Constitutionally
ineligible to be President. We need 60 to 100 million people
aware!
obamacrimes c/o Philip J. Berg, Esq. 555 Andorra Glen Court, Suite 12 Lafayette Hill, PA 19444-2531`
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
For Immediate Release: - 04/09/2009
For Further Information Contact:
Philip J. Berg, Esquire 555 Andorra Glen Court, Suite 12 Lafayette Hill, PA 19444-2531 Cell (610) 662-3005 (610) 825-3134 (800) 993-PHIL [7445] Fax (610) 834-7659
Berg states Hollister case has been ‘Appealed’ as Opinion is so ‘outrageous’ and Sanction imposed was ‘totally unfair’ Judge showed his total bias since case was filed We will be successful on Appeal ! Spread the word !
(Lafayette Hill, PA – 04/09209) - Philip J. Berg, Esquire, the first Attorney who filed suit against Barack H. Obama challenging Senator Obama's lack of Constitutional "qualifications/eligibility" to serve as President of the United States and his cases that are still pending, Berg vs. Obama [2 cases – 1 under seal] and Hollister vs. Soetoro a/k/a Obama, et al announced today that an Appeal has been filed in the Hollister case for several reasons.
Judge James Robertson showed his bias from the time the case was filed: 1) Berg and Joyce filed Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice and Judge Robertson stated he would hold in abeyance until we appeared in front of him ……….and then he would make a decision if we should be admitted…….; 2) Judge Robertson never scheduled a Hearing regarding our Motion Pro Hac Vice; 3) Judge Robertson was aware our local Washington, DC attorney, age 84, was not computer savvy; 4) Judge Robertson issued two [2] Orders, one [1] with two [2] days to respond and one [1] with one [1] day to respond, Motions that we responded to because others made us aware.
The decision by Judge Robertson in dismissing our case showed further his bias as he made statements that were totally untrue and no evidence thereof had been presented. Specifically, Judge Robertson stated how Obama’s citizenship has been “vetted, blogged, texted, twittered” during the two years of his campaign. This statement regarding Obama is so outrageous as Obama was never vetted or otherwise questioned.
Further, Judge Robertson keeps referring to Obama being “Native-born,” a new term in the efforts to justify Obama’s citizenship. The Constitution and all lawsuits attempting to discover the “truth” about Obama refer to the words in the Constitution, that being “Natural Born.”
Without testimony being presented, Judge Robertson decides our Interpleader case is “frivolous,” a decision that we completely differ with.
Judge Robertson refers to attorney Joyce and myself as “agents provocateurs.” I am honored by this designation because it shows that we are determined to expose the HOAX of Obama, the greatest HOAX upon the citizens of the United States in the history of our country, over 230 years.
The imposition of sanctions by way of a “Reprimand” to our local counsel, John D. Hemenway, Esquire was uncalled for and another attempt by Judge Robertson to stop the legitimate search for the truth about Obama’s citizenship. The following remarks by Margaret Calhoun Hemenway are right on point, “This is not a political issue – it is a legal issue and one of paramount national importance. Some question the wisdom of "undoing" an election if Obama's doubters are proven right. My father-in-law has lived through a World War, an actual impeachment and a President who was forced to resign under threat of impeachment – the nation survived, without chaos. The greatest danger to our freedom is disrespect for the Constitution and a President, who by his failure to provide evidence of his eligibility for the Presidency, evidently doesn't believe the rules should apply to him.” Berg continued, “The Obama candidacy is the biggest "HOAX" perpetrated on the citizens of the United States in 230 years, since our nation was established. Obama must be legally removed from office. I believe that 10 to 15 million people are aware of the Obama 'HOAX,' and we must make 75 million people aware. When people are made aware of the Obama 'HOAX,' that Obama has not proven he is constitutionally 'qualified/eligible' to be President; that Obama has not produced his original (vault version) 'Birth Certificate;' that Obama has not produced legal documents to show he legally changed his name from his 'adopted' name of 'Barry Soetoro' from Indonesia; they will demand Obama be removed from his office of President of the United States."
Berg concluded, "I am proceeding for the 305 + million people in 'our' U.S.A., for 'our' forefathers and for the tens of thousands of men and women that have died and/or been maimed defending our Constitution, with our legal fight to prove that Obama is not constitutionally qualified/eligible to be President."
The following is an update on my three [3] pending cases regarding my challenge to Obama's lack of qualifications/eligibility to be President.
Also, I am preparing to file a 4th case - Quo Warranto [challenge person in office - that does not meet the qualifications].
As you know, I was the first to legally raise the issue - having filed my lawsuit on August 21, 2008, before the DNC Convention
Status of Cases:
Berg vs. Obama, Third Circuit Court of Appeals No. 08 – 4340 Brief have been filed by all parties. This is case that was dismissed in U.S. District Court, Eastern District of PA Judge Surrick dismissed for lack of "standing" by Philip J. Berg This is case that I bypassed Third Circuit to U.S. Supreme Court - where U.S. Supreme Court denied several Injunctions and to hear case. However, case is still alive in Third Circuit. Oral argument is scheduled for the end of May 2009.
Berg vs. Obama, U.S. District Court Case filed under seal on 11/07/08 – cannot be discussed
Hollister vs. Soetoro a/k/a Obama, U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia, No. 09-5080 U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, No. 08-cv-02254 This is the case of retired Air Force Colonel Hollister who is on lifetime Presidential recall. Hollister needs to know if recalled by Soetoro/Obama - must he obey an Order by legal President or disobey the illegal Order by a constitutionally ineligible/unqualified "Usurper" President. Case was dismissed and Sanction of “Reprimand” imposed on our local attorney. Appeal has been filed to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This website was created after research indicated that Barack Obama is not a "natural born" citizen or a Citizen of the United States as required by the United States Constitution to be eligible for the Office of President. Former Deputy State Attorney General, Attorney Philip J. Berg filed a lawsuit against Barack Obama and the Democratic National Committee. This case is now pending at the U. S. Supreme Court. The United States Constitution The executive Power shall be vested in a President of the United States of America. He shall hold his Office during the Term of four Years, and, together with the Vice President, chosen for the same Term, be elected, as follows: ...No Person except a natural born Citizen ........ shall be eligible to the Office of President; neither shall any person be eligible to that Office who shall not have attained to the Age of thirty five Years, and been fourteen Years a Resident within the United States. (words were removed for clarification purposes only)
04/09/09: PRESS RELEASE Berg States Hollister case has been 'Appealed' as Opinion is so 'outrageous' and Sanction imposed was 'totally unfair' Judge showed his total bias since case was filed. Berg states Hollister case has been ‘Appealed’ as Opinion is so ‘outrageous’ and Sanction imposed was ‘totally unfair’ Judge showed his total bias since case was filed. We will be successful on Appeal! Spread the word ! (Lafayette Hill, PA – 04/09/2009) - Philip J. Berg, Esquire, the first Attorney who filed suit against Barack H. Obama challenging Senator Obama's lack of Constitutional qualifications/eligibility" to serve as President of the United States and his cases that are still pending, Berg vs. Obama [2 cases – 1 under seal] and Hollister vs. Soetoro a/k/a Obama, et al announced today that an Appeal has been filed in the Hollister case for several reasons. Judge James Robertson showed his bias from the time the case was filed: 1) Berg and Joyce filed Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice and Judge Robertson stated he would hold in abeyance until we appeared in front of him ……….and then he would make a decision if we should be admitted…….; 2) Judge Robertson never scheduled a Hearing regarding our Motion Pro Hac Vice; 3) Judge Robertson was aware our local Washington, DC attorney, age 84, was not computer savvy; 4) Judge Robertson issued two [2] Orders, one [1] with two [2] days to respond and one [1] with one [1] day to respond, Motions that we responded to because others made us aware. The decision by Judge Robertson in dismissing our case showed further his bias as he made statements that were totally untrue and no evidence thereof had been presented. Specifically, Judge Robertson stated how Obama’s citizenship has been “vetted, blogged, texted, twittered” during the two years of his campaign. This statement regarding Obama is so outrageous as Obama was never vetted or otherwise questioned. Further, Judge Robertson keeps referring to Obama being “Native-born,” a new term in the efforts to justify Obama’s citizenship. The Constitution and all lawsuits attempting to discover the “truth” about Obama refer to the words in the Constitution, that being “Natural Born.” Without testimony being presented, Judge Robertson decides our Interpleader case is “frivolous,” a decision that we completely differ with. Judge Robertson refers to attorney Joyce and myself as “agents provocateurs.” I am honored by this designation because it shows that we are determined to expose the HOAX of Obama, the greatest HOAX upon the citizens of the United States in the history of our country, over 230 years. The imposition of sanctions by way of a “Reprimand” to our local counsel, John D. Hemenway, Esquire was uncalled for and another attempt by Judge Robertson to stop the legitimate search for the truth about Obama’s citizenship. The following remarks by Margaret Calhoun Hemenway are right on point, “This is not a political issue – it is a legal issue and one of paramount national importance. Some question the wisdom of "undoing" an election if Obama's doubters are proven right. My father-in-law has lived through a World War, an actual impeachment and a President who was forced to resign under threat of impeachment – the nation survived, without chaos. The greatest danger to our freedom is disrespect for the Constitution and a President, who by his failure to provide evidence of his eligibility for the Presidency, evidently doesn't believe the rules should apply to him.” Berg continued, “The Obama candidacy is the biggest "HOAX" perpetrated on the citizens of the United States in 230 years, since our nation was established. Obama must be legally removed from office. I believe that 10 to 15 million people are aware of the Obama 'HOAX,' and we must make 75 million people aware. When people are made aware of the Obama 'HOAX,' that Obama has not proven he is constitutionally 'qualified/eligible' to be President; that Obama has not produced his original (vault version) 'Birth Certificate;' that Obama has not produced legal documents to show he legally changed his name from his 'adopted' name of 'Barry Soetoro' from Indonesia; they will demand Obama be removed from his office of President of the United States." Berg concluded, "I am proceeding for the 305 + million people in 'our' U.S.A., for 'our' forefathers and for the tens of thousands of men and women that have died and/or been maimed defending our Constitution, with our legal fight to prove that Obama is not constitutionally qualified/eligible to be President." The following is an update on my three [3] pending cases regarding my challenge to Obama's lack of qualifications/ eligibility to be President. Also, I am preparing to file a 4th case - Quo Warranto [challenge person in office - that does not meet the qualifications]. As you know, I was the first to legally raise the issue – having filed my lawsuit on August 21, 2008, before the DNC Convention Status of Cases: Berg vs. Obama, Third Circuit Court of Appeals No. 08 – 4340 Briefs have been filed by all parties. This is case that was
dismissed in U.S. District Court, Eastern District of PA Berg vs.
Obama, U.S. District Court Hollister
vs. Soetoro a/k/a Obama,
|
Interviews with Attorney Philip J. Berg | ||
|
Radio Interviews NEW-Interview with Phil, Lisa, and MommaE on the Chalice Show 5-6-2009 NEW-Interview with Phil, Lisa, and MommaE on the Sentinel Radio 5-11-2009
Illuminati Films Video
Phil Berg discusses why he filed the lawsuit in front of Independence Hall Fox News Video Webster Tarplay - World Crisis Radio interview with Philip J. Berg
National Press Club Conference, Monday, December 8, 2008 |
|
